Diagnosing and Documenting Malnutrition

By
Original story posted on: December 11, 2017
Dieticians’ findings must find their way into the medical record to achieve proper care and coding.

Diagnosing malnutrition is not diving for dollars.

Malnutrition – and I am specifically talking about undernutrition today – is a common but frequently unrecognized problem that leads to difficulty healing from trauma or surgery, or recovery from acute or chronic illnesses. It leaves patients vulnerable to secondary conditions like vitamin deficiencies and skin wounds.

Have you ever heard of the term “prehabilitation?” The concept was developed to prepare patients for elective orthopedic surgeries by giving them strength training to prevent injuries. It is now being expanded to other surgeries, to include cardiopulmonary training and optimizing nutritional status. It is meant to give patients reserves to withstand physical challenges. Surgeons are recognizing that nutrition in particular matters.

If I were a dietitian, I would be very irritated if I went through the effort of doing a thorough assessment of a patient’s nutritional status only to realize that the physician never looked at or acknowledged my findings or implemented my recommendations. If they do, but never document it, they don’t get credit for it, because it isn’t entered into the risk adjustment calculation.

Just like any other condition, the clinician should be making a diagnosis, giving clinical support, and doing something about it, if possible. A patient does not need to be prescribed appetite stimulants, but there should be some enteral or parenteral support.

If there is some degree of malnutrition, the dietitian should draw his or her conclusion. Giving a risk assessment is not the same as declaring, “this patient has moderate protein calorie malnutrition.”

Each organization should figure out a system to interface the dietitian’s consult with the clinician’s workflow so they can be made aware that the dietitian has accomplished the necessary tasks and is ready for the clinician to act on their recommendations. My old hospital system designed an electronic solution, and we eliminated many malnutrition queries, which up until then had constituted 20 percent of the total.

Providers often ask, what are the criteria for malnutrition? The most commonly referenced guidelines are found in the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition’s (ASPEN’s) consensus statement from 2012.

My personal practice was to look for weight loss, subcutaneous fat loss, and muscle wasting, as well as decreased hand grip strength in the context of the underlying disease process. If I had the urge to use the terms “cachectic,” “emaciated,” “thin,” “skeletal,” or “failure to thrive,” I recognized that there was some degree of undernutrition. You can be obese or edematous and have malnutrition at the same time, but sometimes we must use baby steps in the emergency department.

My recommendation to you is to have providers document malnutrition when it is present, with the proper degree, to give clinical support, and to address it with appropriate therapy.
Disclaimer: Every reasonable effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this information at the time it was published. However, due to the nature of industry changes over time we cannot guarantee its validity after the year it was published.
Erica E. Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS has a unique perspective as a practicing emergency physician for 25 years, with extensive coding, CDI, and ICD-10 expertise. She was a physician advisor of a large multi-hospital system for four years before transitioning to independent consulting in July 2016. Her passion is educating CDI specialists, coders, and healthcare providers with engaging, case-based presentations on documentation, CDI, and denials management topics. She has written numerous articles and serves as the co-host of Talk Ten Tuesdays, a weekly national podcast. Dr. Remer is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board, the ACDIS Advisory Board, and the board of directors of the American College of Physician Advisors.

Related Stories

  • Facilitators in Communication of Patient Care versus Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists
    Creating a new vision for CDI. There has certainly been much discussion in the revenue cycle community regarding the “I” in CDI, with the idea of changing clinical documentation “improvement” to “clinical documentation integrity.” Rather than centering on “improvement” versus…
  • Coding Clinic Advice Highlights from First Quarter
    Guidance and advice effective with discharges occurring on and after March 20, 2019.  For coding and CDI (clinical documentation improvement/integrity) professionals, it’s exciting to read over the American Hospital Association (AHA) Coding Clinic on ICD-10-CM/PCS. This publication is a must-have document…
  • Searching for Efficiency in the CDI Process
    When efficiency is not truly efficient, after all. “Efficiency” may be defined in many ways, including the following, as described by dictionary.com: Able to accomplish something with the least waste of time and effort; competency in performance. An accomplishment or ability…