December 7, 2015

Five Tips to Ensure Compliance with ICD-10-PCS: Part Two


In our last piece, the first article in a two-part series about ICD-10-PCS, we discussed excision versus resection, occlusion versus restriction, knowing when to report multiple procedures, and more. This piece, the second in that series, provides five additional ICD-10-PCS coding tips. Be sure to also reference our previous article on important ICD-10-CM guideline changes

1. When reporting biopsies with more definitive procedures, don’t forget to code the biopsy in addition to the main procedure. In some cases, the physician will perform a more definitive procedure (e.g., destruction, excision, or resection) after he or she performs a biopsy (i.e., diagnostic excision, extraction, or drainage). When the biopsy and definitive procedure occur at the same operative site, report both procedures. 

For example, biopsy of a skin lesion denotes melanoma on frozen section. The surgeon performs extensive excision of tissue from the area. Coders should report both the biopsy and excision of tissue. 

2. Understand the concept of external approach. Report an external approach for procedures performed within an orifice on structures that are visible without the aid of any instrumentation. For example, report an external approach for release of a tongue tie.

Open procedures require the physician to cut through skin, subcutaneous tissue, or other tissue to expose the site of the procedure. 

3. Don’t forget about Appendix D (body part key). For example, the PCS table for a tendon repair doesn’t include an option for the Achilles tendon. However, when referencing the body part key, the coder is directed to the lower leg tendon. 

4. Use other appendices included in the ICD-10-PCS Manual. For example, Appendix F (device key and aggregation table) provides information about certain devices and their corresponding PCS descriptions.

Appendix G provides a PCS description and corresponding device terms. 

5. Understand the main objective of the procedure to determine the root operation. For example, a patient with a stenotic urethra undergoes placement of a stent.

The main objective of the procedure is to dilate the urethra and not simply to insert a stent. Dilation is the proper root operation.

Two points to remember:

  • The root operation is based on the procedure actually performed, which may or may not have been the intended procedure.
  • If the desired result is not attained after completion of the procedure (i.e. the artery does not remain expanded after the dilation procedure), the root operation is still determined by the procedure actually performed.

Be sure to keep the 2016 ICD-10-PCS guidelines handy to ensure compliance and refresh your memory until these guidelines become more familiar.



Cathie Wilde, RHIA, CCS

Cathie Wilde, RHIA, CCS, is the director of coding services for MRA. Ms. Wilde has been active in the healthcare industry for more than 30 years. Her previous positions have included assistant director of HIM, DRG coordinator at the Massachusetts Hospital Association, and DRG validator at Blue Cross Blue Shield. She has extensive experience in ICD-9-CM and CPT coding, auditing, data analysis, development and testing of coding products, specialized reporting, and in-service training. As director she is responsible for overseeing the coding division, providing the strategic direction of MRA as a local industry leader of quality coding, auditing, and denial management services. Ms. Wilde is an American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA)-approved ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer.

Related Stories

  • How 2018 Impacts ICD-10-CM Cardiology Diagnosis Coding
    There are now five types of myocardial infarction (MI) code categories, and the author describes these new options and how they will impact reimbursement. For cardiology, the focus of ICD-10 is generally on increased specificity and documenting the downstream effects…
  • Warning: Medical Necessity isn’t Medical Decision-Making
    Why the Highmark decision—since rescinded—was wrong about medical decision-making relative to medical necessity. When payers and coders downcode evaluation and management (E&M) notes based on medical necessity, how do they determine what level of history and exam is medically necessary…
  • Making the Case for Good Auditing
    In this article, the author gives a shout-out to auditors for the good work they do. For those of you who are CEOs, CFOs, medical directors, etc., I would like you to take a moment and read the excerpt below,…