Updated on: March 21, 2016

ICD-10: MS-DRG Validation Still a Priority

By
Original story posted on: June 30, 2014

Given the recent extension of the ICD-10 compliance date, many hospitals are stepping back and re-evaluating project plans and timelines to use this time to improve their transition readiness.

Attention is being given to additional education and practice (i.e., dual coding) for coding professionals, increased clinical documentation improvement (CDI) efforts so that medical record documentation supports the specificity available in ICD-10, as well as investigating, implementing, and/or fine-tuning computer-assisted coding (CAC) technology. MS-DRG validation is another process to consider that may assist in the goal of achieving accurate inpatient reimbursement under ICD-10. If correct code and MS-DRG assignment isn’t happening now in ICD-9, chances are it won’t be happening in ICD-10 either.

In addition to handling Medicare fee-for-service, many payors reimburse inpatient stays based on MS-DRGs or some form of DRG system. Inpatient hospitalization is a costly level of care, and hospitals need to assure that the correct DRGs are being assigned and billed to receive proper reimbursement for the conditions treated and services provided. 

Hospital inpatient reimbursement continues to be at risk whether or not third-party payers are actively auditing for recoupment. While Recovery Auditors target cases at risk for overpayments, in my experience conducting MS-DRG validation audits for educational and compliance purposes, the majority of the findings are underpayments. This means that hospitals may be leaving money on the table when it comes to DRG reimbursement. It’s been said that coding, like medicine, is not an exact science. Inpatient coding professionals must read and interpret medical record documentation to determine what conditions and procedures can be coded and then make the correct code assignments, taking into consideration any index and tabular instructions, coding guidelines, and/or Coding Clinic advice.

Throw in additional challenges such as rapidly deployed electronic medical record documentation systems (which are significantly increasing the quantity of medical record information that needs to be reviewed), a shortage in experienced coding professionals, and increasing productivity demands, and the end result could be inaccurate MS-DRG assignment.

In addition to reimbursement, correct code and DRG assignment is needed to determine quality and core measures of populations for accurate comparative data (i.e., severity of illness and risk of mortality scores) and healthcare statistics used for research and registries.

Validating correct MS-DRG assignment in ICD-9 also will prepare coding professionals for getting it right in ICD-10. Many of the lessons learned from MS-DRG validation in ICD-9 will carry over to ICD-10 (i.e., principal diagnosis selection, sequencing, linking of conditions, clinical validation, application of coding guidelines, etc.). 

Hospitals have options when it comes to MS-DRG validation. They may choose to use internal staff or contract with an outside vendor. The validation can be done pre-bill (after final coding but prior to billing the inpatient claim) or post-payment, after the inpatient claim has already been paid. For hospitals that outsource their coding, the outsourcing company should have an internal coding quality review process – and hospitals should confirm this. It still also would be beneficial to periodically conduct or contract for independent MS-DRG validation. 

No matter what form or fashion MS-DRG validation is being performed, the findings should be trended and followed up on to prevent future errors. Opportunities for improvements identified may be related to coding education (i.e., adherence to coding guidelines, knowledge of disease processes or surgical techniques, etc.), physician documentation, electronic medical records (i.e., identifying revisions needed to templates, canned text, problem lists, etc.), processes such as final coding without a discharge summary or combining of accounts for billing purposes, as well as system issues related to the flow of data from registration to coding/abstracting to billing systems. MS-DRG validation audits also may provide insight into what is working well so those actions can be recognized and repeated. In the end, the goal is to receive proper DRG reimbursement for the inpatient services provided.

Taking the time and effort to periodically assess MS-DRG accuracy and investigate the cases that fall short will increase the chances of getting it right upfront for similar cases in the future, no matter what classification system is being used – ICD-9 or ICD-10.

About the Author

Sandra Routhier is an independent HIM and coding consultant. She has more than 25 years of experience in health information management, revenue cycle, project management, and information systems. Sandra is a Registered Health Information Administrator, Certified Coding Specialist, and Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer through the American Health Information Management Association. 

Contact the Author

To comment on this article go to

Disclaimer: Every reasonable effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this information at the time it was published. However, due to the nature of industry changes over time we cannot guarantee its validity after the year it was published.
Sandra Routhier, RHIA, CCS, AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer

Sandra Routhier is an independent HIM and coding consultant. She has more than 25 years of experience in health information management, revenue cycle, project management, and information systems. Sandra is a Registered Health Information Administrator, Certified Coding Specialist, and Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer through the American Health Information Management Association.

Related Stories

  • Things Your Mother Never Told You About HCC: Version 23
    The 2019 CMS risk adjustment model is version 23. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released, in April, the latest update to the CMS-hierarchical condition category (HCC) Risk Adjustment Model (V23).  It applies to payment year 2019.  As…
  • Digesting the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for 2019
    CMS issued the final rule on Nov. 1. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) final rule includes updates to payment policies, payment rates, and quality provisions for services furnished under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) on or…
  • Final Rules from CMS Offer Something for Everyone
    CMS updated Medicare regulations for 2019 EDITOR’S NOTE: Veteran Washington, D.C. observer Stanley Nachimson reported on the final rules from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) during Talk-Ten-Tuesdays today. The following is a transcription of his remarks. The…