Updated on: November 28, 2016

ICD-10: Smooth Transition for Claims, PMS Vendors Cautiously Optimistic

By Jill Finn
Original story posted on: October 25, 2015

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is a rough transcript of comments made by Jill Finn during the Oct. 12, 2015 broadcast of Talk Ten Tuesdays.

The HATA (Healthcare Administrative Technology Association) practice management members as well as our members from organizations like the AMA (American Medical Association) and UnitedHealthcare have been touching base through email almost daily since Oct. 1, and we’re meeting weekly with Denesecia Green, who is the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) ICD-10 Lead, to exchange issues and find solutions.

From a support perspective, across the board for HATA members, call volumes for our service departments have been lower than anticipated, some as much as 25 percent lower than we had projected, so that’s been great news for our employees who were expecting to be taking calls around the clock.  

We’ve also seen a change in call types, whereas a few weeks ago the majority of calls were around setup and configuration and now we’re seeing a shift into more coding and claims-related questions.

From a provider readiness standpoint, what we’ve seen so far is that a large percentage of our clients are submitting ICD-10 claims, and while that number is increasing on a daily basis, there are still some stragglers. Some are still working through their ICD-9 backlogs, some have processes to submit in batches on a certain cadence (so this could be weekly, bi-weekly, etc.), some are holding onto their claims to double and triple-check their coding, and a few are just letting the dust settle before they submit. What it comes down to is that there’s still a bit of anxiety about getting paid. 

While we hope to not have to utilize this often, one thing that all of our HATA members have done for our providers is build contingency plans into the software to allow offices to toggle between ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes in the event that a payer isn’t ready to accept ICD-10 codes.

As far as ICD-10 claims submission goes, we’re not seeing any glaring issues, which tells us that those years of preparation for our software, staff, and customers has been successful. We’re receiving positive feedback from customers on our readiness, and for the most part, the rejections and exclusions we’re seeing are typical. For the few that aren’t, our clearinghouses and payers have been very responsive. 

Mid-last week, we all started seeing payments come back. AdvancedMD, one of our large billing services, reported that they’ve seen thousands of payments come through. They had payments from Medico in 22 states and insurances like UHC, Tricare, BCBS, Aetna, and Cigna have released or approved the first set of the payments across the states for most of the specialties they work with. 

Medicare has also acknowledged the claims and is currently working through processing, so we should have a solid update on those claims. We’re all patiently waiting to see what the next week or two of adjudication brings and will continue monitoring denials, rejections, exclusions, and other trends.

We’re also keeping a close eye on the few issues that have come out like medical necessity and ensuring that LCD and NCD policies contain accurate information for ICD-10. Having this collaboration across the industry and within our member group has allowed us to keep our services departments and our customers informed and aware of potential impacts.

HATA practice management vendors are experiencing a surprisingly smooth transition for claim setup and submission, and we’re staying cautiously optimistic about a positive claims adjudication experience for our customers in the weeks ahead.

About the Author

Jill Finn is the Information Technology Release Manager at ADP AdvancedMD.  She has more than 10 years of experience in the healthcare IT industry, leading teams to success across a diverse range of products, including practice management, revenue cycle management and human capital management.  She is a board member of the Healthcare Administrative Technology Association (HATA) and served on the Advisory Committee for the Practice Management System Accreditation Program (PMSAP) led by EHNAC and WEDI.

Contact the Author


Comment on this Article

Editor for icd10monitor.com

Disclaimer: Every reasonable effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this information at the time it was published. However, due to the nature of industry changes over time we cannot guarantee its validity after the year it was published.

Related Stories

  • Proposed Biannual ICD-10 Implementation Dates: Weighing the Pros & Cons 
    Understanding the impact on business processes in the event that biannual ICD-10-CM and PCS updates are implemented is essential – as is your feedback.  With a comprehensive agenda covered at the virtual ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting earlier this…
  • CDC Releases Updated Guidelines
    The guidelines are effective from Jan. 1, 2021 through Sept. 30, 2021. On Dec. 16, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released updated ICD-10-CM Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines for 2021. The updated document can be found…
  • ICD-10 Codes Amid the Pandemic and the U.S. Election
    The mood of the country impacts claims. There are a few words that can be associated with the pandemic and the election. These words are the following: Stress – a state of mental or emotional strain or tension resulting from…